✅ “Robinhood (2025)” is a Telugu-language action-crime-thriller film directed and written by Venky Kudumula. Starring Nithiin in the titular role alongside Sreeleela, the movie attempts to portray a modern-day Robin Hood who navigates a world of high-stakes theft and unexpected alliances. Released on March 28, 2025, the film combines elements of action, suspense, and drama, seeking to offer an engaging cinematic experience with a significant budget from Mythri Movie Makers.

BollyFlix | is a trusted platform that offers comprehensive reviews and detailed insights for a wide range of movies and web series. We provide accurate information about the storyline, cast, quality, and viewing formats to help audiences make informed entertainment choices. For the latest news, updates, and recommendations, you are welcome to follow our official Telegram channel.

5.3/10

Robinhood

Director: Venky Kudumula

Writers: Venky Kudumula

Stars: Nithiin, Sreeleela, Vennela Kishore

Country: India, Bangladesh

Genres: Action

Languages: Telugu

Overview: Ram, a modern-day Robin Hood, is a master thief who unexpectedly finds himself switching sides. When fate forces him to become the personal security officer for Neera, a rollercoaster ride of action,...

TMDb: View on TMDb

Robinhood (2025) – Movie Overview & Analysis-BollyFlix

Movie Details 

• Full Name: Robinhood (2025)
• Language: Telugu (Also dubbed in Hindi for TV Premiere)
• Budget: ₹60 crore (Approx. $7.2 million USD)
• Revenue: Not publicly disclosed, but reportedly underperformed commercially.
• Runtime: 156 Minutes (2 Hours 36 Minutes)
• Release Date: March 28, 2025 (Worldwide theatrical)
• Genres: Action, Crime, Thriller, Comedy
• Cast: Nithiin, Sreeleela, Shine Tom Chacko, Rajendra Prasad, Vennela Kishore, David Warner (Cameo), Devdatta Nage, Ketika Sharma
• Directors: Venky Kudumula
• Screenplay: Venky Kudumula
• Studios & Producers: Mythri Movie Makers (Producers: Naveen Yerneni, Y. Ravi Shankar)
• Voice Cast: Not Applicable
• Animation & Style: Not Applicable

OFFICIAL IMAGES

Plot Summary

“Robinhood” introduces Ram (Nithiin), a shrewd and enigmatic individual who operates as a modern-day master thief, reminiscent of the legendary outlaw, focusing on robbing the wealthy. The film opens with thrilling sequences of Ram executing his heists, often donning a Santa Claus costume, and being pursued by vigilant police officers, particularly a sharp-minded cop played by Shine Tom Chacko. These early scenes establish Ram’s cunning and the high-stakes world he inhabits, with action sequences culminating in rooftop chases against a backdrop of urban high-rises.

However, the narrative takes an unexpected turn when circumstances compel Ram to switch sides, shifting from being a master thief to potentially becoming a protector or an individual fighting for a different cause. This transition introduces Neera (Sreeleela), a seemingly daft young NRI whose return to India becomes intricately linked to Ram’s evolving mission. The plot, initially promising a cat-and-mouse game, reportedly becomes muddled in its second half. The backdrop shifts from the swanky urban locales of Australia and Hyderabad to a rural, hilly village, causing the narrative momentum to falter. The film struggles to maintain consistency in its protagonist’s motivations, leading to a bizarre tonality and a lack of genuine tension. Despite attempts to spice things up with bullet-time effects and a cameo by David Warner, the plot devolves into a series of contrived moments and generic song-and-dance sequences that serve more as fillers than plot drivers, ultimately making the long duration feel excruciating.

Cast & Crew

“Robinhood” features a notable cast led by Nithiin, who plays the titular character, Ram. Nithiin attempts to bring his signature blend of charm and intensity to the role of a modern-day thief turned complex protagonist. While some critics found his performance adequate, others felt he was let down by an inconsistent script, though he did try to make his character lovable. Sreeleela portrays Neera, an NRI whose character’s portrayal was criticized for being contrived and lacking substantial depth despite her consistent screen presence. Her energetic dancing prowess, often a highlight, was underutilized in the film.

The supporting cast includes seasoned actors like Shine Tom Chacko, who initially impresses as a sharp-minded police officer, a worthy rival to Ram. However, his character reportedly becomes caricatured in later stages, diminishing his impact. Rajendra Prasad and Vennela Kishore provide comedic relief, a staple in Telugu cinema, though their contributions are woven into a script that struggles with consistency. Cricketer David Warner makes a cameo appearance, which was noted by audiences. Director Venky Kudumula also serves as the screenwriter, a dual role that, in this instance, faced criticism for an ill-knitted screenplay that veered off course in the second half. The film is produced by Naveen Yerneni and Y. Ravi Shankar under the banner of Mythri Movie Makers, known for producing big-budget Telugu films.

Critical & Audience Response

“Robinhood (2025)” received a largely negative critical reception. Reviewers frequently described it as a “listless action-comedy that goes nowhere,” criticizing its inconsistent plot and tonal shifts, particularly in the second half. Many pointed out that while the initial premise and Nithiin’s performance showed promise, the screenplay quickly devolved into a series of contrived moments and unnecessary filler sequences, leading to an “excruciatingly long duration.” The film was particularly slammed for failing to maintain tension and for creating a caricature out of the antagonist. Critics also expressed disappointment that Sreeleela’s role was largely ornamental and underutilized, despite her talent.

Audience response, however, was somewhat mixed, though generally leaning towards disappointment for those expecting a cohesive entertainer. While some Nithiin fans appreciated his effort and the initial romantic-comedy elements, the film didn’t resonate broadly. BookMyShow user reviews indicated a strong initial reaction from some loyal fans (e.g., “Nithiin rocks in such rom-com movies, this is what audiences are missing from him”), suggesting a segment of the audience found it lovable. However, this did not translate into strong box office performance, indicating a gap between fan enthusiasm and general audience reception. The film’s inability to deliver a compelling narrative beyond its promising first act hindered its overall reception.

Direction & Cinematography

As both writer and director, Venky Kudumula faced significant criticism for his handling of “Robinhood.” While he managed to establish an exciting premise in the film’s early segments, particularly the vigilante actions of Ram and the initial dynamic with the police officer, his direction reportedly lost its way in the second half. The film struggled with inconsistent pacing and a shifting tonality, leading to a convoluted narrative that failed to maintain audience engagement. Kudumula’s vision, which seemed clear in the setup, became muddled as the plot progressed, unable to effectively weave together action, crime, thriller, and comedic elements into a cohesive whole. This resulted in a film that felt unfocused and often aimless, with many critics pointing to the direction as a key factor in its failure to meet expectations.

While specific details about the cinematographer were not widely publicized in the provided search results, the visuals of “Robinhood” were noted to be somewhat inconsistent. The film features “swanky locales of Australia and Hyderabad” in the first half, suggesting a polished urban aesthetic. There are mentions of “distractingly shiny high-rises” and the use of “bullet time effect for a few action moments,” indicating an attempt at a stylized action visual. However, the visual coherence reportedly suffered when the backdrop shifted to a “rural hilly village,” suggesting a departure from the initial slickness. Overall, while technical aspects like action sequences tried to impress, the overall visual storytelling seemed to reflect the narrative’s lack of a clear direction.

Music & Background Score

The music for “Robinhood” is composed by G. V. Prakash Kumar, a well-known name in South Indian cinema. Kumar’s work generally aims to provide the film with a robust soundtrack and background score fitting for an action-crime-thriller. However, in “Robinhood,” even the musical elements faced critical scrutiny. Reviewers noted the inclusion of “two run-of-the-mill song and dance sequences, and an item song,” which were largely perceived as “fillers” that contributed to the film’s “excruciatingly long duration.” This suggests that while individual tracks might have been decent, their placement and necessity within the narrative were questionable, interrupting the flow rather than enhancing it. The background score, too, likely aimed to build tension during action sequences and add emotional depth to dramatic moments. However, if the overall narrative lacked tension and coherence, even a competent score might struggle to elevate the film’s impact. The criticism implies that the music, despite being by a prominent composer, couldn’t salvage a flawed screenplay and direction, and at times, even inadvertently highlighted the narrative’s weaknesses by drawing out the runtime.

Visuals & Special Effects

“Robinhood” attempts to present a sleek and action-packed visual experience, particularly in its initial sequences set in urban environments. The film showcases “swanky locales of Australia and Hyderabad” with “distractingly shiny high-rises in the backdrop,” suggesting an investment in high-production value sets and locations to establish the world of its modern-day thief. The action choreography is supported by visual effects, with “bullet time effect for a few action moments” being specifically mentioned. These stylistic choices indicate an effort to create visually dynamic and engaging sequences, typical of the action-thriller genre.

However, the effectiveness of these visuals and special effects appears to be inconsistent. As the narrative reportedly shifts from urban settings to a “rural hilly village,” the visual coherence and impact seem to diminish. While the film employs visual effects to enhance action scenes, the overall consensus suggests that these technical elements couldn’t compensate for a weak screenplay. The focus on spectacle in certain moments, like the David Warner cameo, felt more like an attempt to “spruce up things” rather than serving a cohesive visual narrative. Ultimately, despite a clear effort in visual production, the visuals and special effects often felt disjointed from the story’s core, unable to elevate a narrative that struggled with consistency and tension.

Editing & Screenplay

The screenplay for “Robinhood,” penned by director Venky Kudumula, is widely considered the film’s weakest link. While the initial setup introduces a compelling premise of a modern-day vigilante thief, the script reportedly goes “haywire” in its post-interval portions. Critics lamented its inability to “stick to a mood or plotline,” leading to a narrative that loses momentum and consistency. The character motivations of the protagonist, Ram, become unclear, and the antagonist, initially promising, devolves into a caricature, stripping the film of genuine tension. The inclusion of “run-of-the-mill song and dance sequences” and an “item song” are cited as “clear fillers,” further extending the film’s already “excruciatingly long duration.” The screenplay’s contrived moments, particularly in developing Sreeleela’s character, drew criticism for making her largely inconsequential.

Regarding editing, specific credit was not prominently available in the search results, but its impact is evident from critical feedback. A film with an “excruciatingly long duration” and a narrative that “goes nowhere” strongly suggests issues with pacing and structure, which are often rectified in the editing room. The reported lack of tension and the muddled plot indicate that the editing likely struggled to create a cohesive and engaging flow from a problematic screenplay. Even if individual scenes were well-shot, the overall arrangement and trimming might have failed to tighten the narrative, contributing to the film’s “listless” nature.

Positives / What Works

“Robinhood” has a few elements that initially spark interest. The film’s concept of a modern-day Robin Hood is intriguing and sets up a promising premise, particularly in its early segments. Nithiin’s performance as Ram, especially in the initial romantic-comedy elements and action sequences, was considered decent by some, with fans appreciating his presence. The initial action sequences and the cat-and-mouse game between Ram and the police officer (Shine Tom Chacko) show flashes of excitement, with attempts at stylistic visuals like bullet-time effects. The presence of supporting actors like Rajendra Prasad and Vennela Kishore provides moments of intended comedic relief, which might work for a segment of the audience. Additionally, the film benefits from a significant production budget, allowing for polished visuals in certain scenes.

Negatives / What Doesn’t Work

The primary drawbacks of “Robinhood” stem from its inconsistent and “ill-knitted screenplay” which loses direction significantly in the second half. The film suffers from a lack of sustained tension and an unclear narrative arc, particularly regarding the protagonist’s motivations. The antagonist’s character, initially promising, becomes a “caricature,” failing to pose a credible threat. The inclusion of “run-of-the-mill” song-and-dance numbers and an item song are seen as unnecessary “fillers” that bloat the film’s already “excruciatingly long duration.” Sreeleela’s character is largely ornamental and contrived, failing to utilize her talent. The frequent shifts in backdrop and tone make the film feel disjointed, leading to a “listless action-comedy that goes nowhere.” Overall, the execution falls short of the intriguing premise.

Final Verdict / Conclusion

“Robinhood (2025)” is a film that began with an exciting premise but ultimately struggled in its execution. While Nithiin attempts to carry the film with his performance and the initial action sequences show promise, director Venky Kudumula’s screenplay loses its way, resulting in a convoluted and overlong narrative. The film’s inability to maintain narrative consistency, develop its characters effectively, or build sustained tension significantly hampers its potential. Despite a decent budget and efforts in visual spectacle, “Robinhood” largely disappoints critics, though some segments of the audience might find moments to enjoy, particularly fans of Nithiin’s earlier romantic comedies. Ultimately, it serves as a cautionary tale of how a strong concept can be undone by a weak and unfocused script, leaving audiences with a “listless action-comedy” that fails to deliver on its titular promise.

Movie Rating

Disclaimer: We do not host, upload, or link to any files on our server that violate copyright laws.

OFFICIAL TRAILER

FAQs